Pinoy Business Coach

It is at its highest level since the index was first tracked in 1990.

Between October 2010 and January 2011, the World Bank’s Food Price Index also rose by 15 percent. It is just 3 percent under its peak recorded in June 2008—at the height of the last global food crisis.

Rice, maize and wheat comprise 60 percent of the world’s food energy intake. It is their prices that are increasing very steeply, based on data from both the World Bank and FAO.

According to our Bureau of Agricultural Statistics, local rice prices increased in some key areas, including Cebu and Davao.

Meat prices are stable but those of cooking oil and some vegetables are up. There is certainly room for volatility.

A complex host of factors has constrained food supply and put pressure on demand. Weather catastrophes disrupted production in agricultural centers such as China, Canada, Australia and Russia—all of which belong to the world’s 10 leading producers of wheat.

Last year Russia experienced its highest recorded temperature in 130 years—the most widespread drought in 30 years—and wildfires that swept seven regions.

Some 20 percent of Russia’s wheat harvest was wiped out, and the country temporarily banned export.

Last year excessive rainfall unexpectedly hit Canada’s prairie region, resulting in the largest idling of agricultural land in Western Canada since the 1970s. Canada’s wheat production went down by as much as 25 percent as a result.

Wet weather and calamitous flooding in the state of Queensland last December are expected to reduce up to 50 percent of Australia’s wheat harvest this year to feed grade.

Large dust storms and winter drought devastated the North China Plain. China, the world’s top wheat producer, has always been self-reliant. But now it needs to import grain for its 1.3 billion people.

Moreover, hot weather followed by heavy rains last year curbed output across the United States Corn Belt. Similarly, corn harvest in Argentina, the world’s second-biggest exporter behind the US, is predicted to fall below this year’s estimates because of drought.

Thailand, the world’s top rice exporter, was also hit last year by the most destructive floods in five decades. They cut down output by about 7 percent.

Climate-change impacts can dramatically intensify food insecurity. Scientific research warns that the world will be a lot warmer by the end of the 21st century—if we do not abate greenhouse-gas production.

This means that growing season temperature in the tropics and subtropics will rise—significantly decreasing crop yields.

Food and fuel are inextricably linked. Agriculture has been supporting human settlements for 10,000 years, but not until the Industrial Revolution did food production rise to an unprecedented scale through the use of fossil fuel.

A 2007 study by the UK’s Sustainable Development Commission suggests that if oil prices increase from $50 to $100 per barrel, the additional production cost can raise farm-gate prices by 3 percent to 13 percent.

Yesterday US crude for April delivery closed at $105.02 per barrel as turmoil persists in the Middle East.

Meanwhile, Dubai crude, the Asian benchmark, hit $110.63 per barrel on Monday.

We are particularly vulnerable because we source about 80 percent of our oil needs from the Middle East. Since last week, local oil companies raised prices thrice, resulting in a net increase of P4.75 per liter for gasoline, P4.25 for diesel and P4.75 for kerosene.

High energy prices are also making biofuels more attractive. This creates adverse impacts when corn and sugar production are diverted from food. Data from the US Department of Agriculture show that ethanol for fuel will capture 40 percent of corn harvest in the United States for 2010 to 2011. This is enough to feed 350 million people for one year.

The experience of Egypt and Tunisia—where skyrocketing food prices fueled recent protests that prompted their presidents to flee—provides us valuable lessons. Analysts believe that outrage over the abuse and inaction of national leaders provokes food riots more than actual hunger.

The same is true of the unrest in Algeria, Mauritania, Gabon, Cameroon and Zimbabwe. These are oddly reminiscent of the food riots that broke out in more than 40 countries in 2008.

This tells us that inaction is a dangerous choice.

We have yet to see the current administration craft a coherent plan that will ensure the sufficiency of our food supply and the stability of food prices.

The high cost of food is a politically sensitive issue here in our country—since the bottom 80 percent of our population allot 60 percent of their expenditures on food—and half of this goes to buying rice.

Philippine history has shown that stabilizing the price of rice has been crucial for incumbent administrations—particularly during election years.

A 2005 study by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) cites as examples the failed reelection bids of both Presidents Carlos P. Garcia and Diosdado Macapagal, which were preceded by rice-price hikes and mounting skepticism about their leaderships.

The agriculture sector demands renewed attention. Agricultural productivity has failed to keep pace with increasing demand from a world population that grows by 219,000 each day.

Agriculture has fallen to systemic neglect—since the Green Revolution from the 1960s to the 1970s, when high-yielding varieties of rice and wheat were developed, leading to dramatic increases in output.

Official development assistance to agriculture has been dropping from a high of 17 percent in 1979 to only 5.5 percent in 2007. This has contributed to a sharp increase in global hunger.

The FAO says the developing world needs to double food production by 2050 to feed its growing population. This entails over $200 billion in agricultural investments per year.

How much are we spending on agriculture? Our combined budget for agriculture and agrarian reform for this year is only P66 billion.

We badly need a new Green Revolution that is more efficient and more ecologically sound. In the short term, we must make agriculture a more attractive investment area.

This is currently not the case: banks and financial institutions would rather pay the penalty than comply with the Agri-Agra Law mandating them to set aside 25 percent of their loanable funds for agriculture.

Farmlands should be bankable as collateral, so that farmers can gain access to credit needed for farming inputs and expansion. Not only will this give our farmers a stable means of financing: it will also save them from having to resort to usurious lenders.

We should also protect our consumers from profiteers who can aggravate the situation by speculating and hoarding.

But, over the long term, we must consistently increase investment in agriculture.

First, we must provide our farmers with adequate support, such as better infrastructure, good irrigation systems and postharvest network. These are basic to expanding our agricultural productivity.

Second, we must modernize agriculture and harness innovations in technology to improve production. Remote sensing and satellite imagery, for instance, can help our farmers maximize the use of agricultural inputs, such as water, fertilizers and seeds.

Third, investment in agriculture must emphasize research and development, especially in more efficient breeding and farming practices. Agricultural R&D investments in developing countries have an average rate of return of 43 percent, and can provide solutions to food supply shortages posed by climate change, farmland conversion, and a growing population.

Last, we must ensure that our agricultural development does not exacerbate climate change. We must effectively produce food and energy simultaneously by using multicropping systems, agro-industrial technology and renewable power.

The coming food crisis—like the one that gripped the world in 2008—could be mere snippets of global food insecurity in the next 30, 40 years, unless we take decisive action on agriculture and the environment now.

According to the World Bank, some 44 million people in developing countries have been thrust into extreme poverty by soaring food prices since last June.

People are eating less and subsisting on lower-priced but less nutritious foods. Whatever gains we have achieved in reducing poverty, hunger and malnutrition are in danger of being reversed.

Let us not wait for Filipinos to take to the streets before we do something.

Let us not wait to be hit by more natural disasters before we act.

The food crisis is real, and it is upon us.

Complacency is not an option. 

*Senator Angara is right, we as a nation is unprepared for a looming food security crisis in the making.  There are no plans to solidify agriculture and to provide easy credit access.  This is one opportunity that others may want to start a business on.  Social Entrepreneurship can be a helpful tool to fill in the gaps of service that the government cannot provide as of this time.